readertaya.blogg.se

1. EXIFTOOL HISTOGRAM PHOYOSHOP HOW TO
2. EXIFTOOL HISTOGRAM PHOYOSHOP PROFESSIONAL
3. EXIFTOOL HISTOGRAM PHOYOSHOP WINDOWS

(Two years ago, I associated searches with network attacks.) Since I don't trust their services, I don't use them. Yandex and Baidu have reverse image search engines, but they bothered me. If people are talking about it, then it is probably discussed on Reddit.

Was it altered? Is it cropped? Where did it originally come from? They used to use Google to answer these questions. You want to search the Internet for variations of this picture. be upset by this change? Let's say you have a picture of questionable origin. So why would investigators, law enforcement, journalists, etc. In other words: you can no longer find variations of the picture. Edits, crops, and even recoloring are omitted from the results. The most recent change that has some people mad? Google appears to have tightened the threshold on the visual-search results so that it only returns instances of the same picture at different resolutions. Most of the page was based on web pages with similar pictures or discussions about the picture, but there was a little search engine at the top (click on the "All Sizes" link) that showed variations of the same picture. At this point, they split the results page. The next big change happened when they added in contextual results. The first big change happened a few years ago, when they went from a histogram-based algorithm to an algorithm based on shapes. Each change altered the emphasis for the type of image search. Similarly, Google has changed their search-by-image system a couple of times. Now that I can see the map, I've gone back to using it. (If I can't see the map, then why bother?) Earlier this year, they changed the layout.

EXIFTOOL HISTOGRAM PHOYOSHOP WINDOWS

Rather than showing the map, they covered up most of the screen with undesirable popup windows and navigation information. For about eight months last year, I completely stopped using Google Maps because their layout changed. Google is constantly changing their algorithms, web results, content, etc.

If I upload a picture of a shoe, what am I really looking for? Am I looking for other instances of that exact picture? Other photos of that type of shoe? Or other pictures of shoes? All are valid options depending on the need for the search. The definition of a "good" search engine really depends on what you're looking for. You type in desirable text and, by page 4 of the results, it is just random noise.)

If the cutoff is too weak, then you'll get back lots of noise. If the cutoff is too strict, then some desirable results may be excluded. With most visual comparison algorithms, there is an adjustable cutoff to separate good-enough matches from poor matches. Third, you need a good comparison threshold. I really don't want someone uploading a picture of a passport and seeing search results that show dozens of valid passports that were uploaded by other people. Right now, there's too many people uploading personally identifiable information.

EXIFTOOL HISTOGRAM PHOYOSHOP HOW TO

However, I'm still working out how to make them publicly accessible. At FotoForensics, I currently have three working image search engines for uploaded content. On this blog, I've written about a couple of the simple algorithms. There are plenty of image comparison algorithms. Second, you need a good search algorithm. Nobody has a bigger index of pictures than Google. First, it needs a large corpus of known photos. Search-by-image functionality requires three things. (Why tell me? They want to know if I have any insight, workaround, or alternative. and they all have the same complaint: the new Google image search sucks.

EXIFTOOL HISTOGRAM PHOYOSHOP PROFESSIONAL

Over the last month, I've heard from over a half-dozen associates - law enforcement, professional investigators, analysts, journalists, etc.